<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tournamentterminator.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>Comment on Is Online Poker Rigged? 7 Poker Myths Busted by Trooth</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/online-poker/rigged-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link> <dc:creator>Trooth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:35:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=180#comment-259</guid> <description>Also, consider this. Live, the best players often are really aggressive, but they play big hands too. Lot of times they are lucky, but they play it right while they have it.. and that affects their image throughout the game.If a player is more tight live, because they&#039;re just more intimidated by those guys.. well online they could be more brave, it&#039;s just like online dating, a LOT easier to be confident and daring than you are live...They KNOW people are like this. They know people who are tight and play cautiously live (IE--not as good live) are more likely to play aggressive online.(In other words, that voids the actually aggressive players who do well live.. because now, &quot;everyone&quot; is playing like them)So, knowing this, they need to put some control into it, as some form of .. I dunno, well a way of saying &quot;hey buddy, you think you&#039;re aggressive online eh? Well.. I&#039;ll show you&quot; and this is why you get all these ridiculous bad beats.It&#039;s a slap in the face. That same hand would&#039;ve likely held up live...But I think, these people are sort of angry that people who weren&#039;t as good live now go online and are suddenly good.Just like with the &#039;online dating&#039; example, it&#039;s as if the &#039;confident pretty&#039; people are angry that &#039;ugly losers&#039; go online and suddenly act and appear as confident as they do and actually GET the dates (snatching them away from those who would&#039;ve in real life)There&#039;s some resentment there... and if &quot;pretty confident&quot; people controlled a dating site, would they then not want to add some control to keep these &quot;fake confident losers&quot; from snatching all their potential dates??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, consider this. Live, the best players often are really aggressive, but they play big hands too. Lot of times they are lucky, but they play it right while they have it.. and that affects their image throughout the game.</p><p>If a player is more tight live, because they&#8217;re just more intimidated by those guys.. well online they could be more brave, it&#8217;s just like online dating, a LOT easier to be confident and daring than you are live&#8230;</p><p>They KNOW people are like this. They know people who are tight and play cautiously live (IE&#8211;not as good live) are more likely to play aggressive online.</p><p>(In other words, that voids the actually aggressive players who do well live.. because now, &#8220;everyone&#8221; is playing like them)</p><p>So, knowing this, they need to put some control into it, as some form of .. I dunno, well a way of saying &#8220;hey buddy, you think you&#8217;re aggressive online eh? Well.. I&#8217;ll show you&#8221; and this is why you get all these ridiculous bad beats.</p><p>It&#8217;s a slap in the face. That same hand would&#8217;ve likely held up live&#8230;</p><p>But I think, these people are sort of angry that people who weren&#8217;t as good live now go online and are suddenly good.</p><p>Just like with the &#8216;online dating&#8217; example, it&#8217;s as if the &#8216;confident pretty&#8217; people are angry that &#8216;ugly losers&#8217; go online and suddenly act and appear as confident as they do and actually GET the dates (snatching them away from those who would&#8217;ve in real life)</p><p>There&#8217;s some resentment there&#8230; and if &#8220;pretty confident&#8221; people controlled a dating site, would they then not want to add some control to keep these &#8220;fake confident losers&#8221; from snatching all their potential dates??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Is Online Poker Rigged? 7 Poker Myths Busted by Trooth</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/online-poker/rigged-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link> <dc:creator>Trooth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=180#comment-257</guid> <description>Oh and please oh please nobody put money in there. Just play freerolls and freebies for prizes, you can find a few that offer free play.. just gotta get past the &#039;donks&#039; (i hate that word) but take advantage of free games with cash or prizes. Why support them??? Take advantage of them just like they do with us.  If I put money in there, I would hope proof comes, then I&#039;m suing the heck out of them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and please oh please nobody put money in there. Just play freerolls and freebies for prizes, you can find a few that offer free play.. just gotta get past the &#8216;donks&#8217; (i hate that word) but take advantage of free games with cash or prizes. Why support them??? Take advantage of them just like they do with us.  If I put money in there, I would hope proof comes, then I&#8217;m suing the heck out of them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Is Online Poker Rigged? 7 Poker Myths Busted by Trooth</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/online-poker/rigged-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link> <dc:creator>Trooth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=180#comment-256</guid> <description>It is rigged. I don&#039;t even question it no more. I play live too and know these things happen live.. shoot tonight it happened big time.. I joked to the table &quot;that hand looked so much like an online hand!&quot; And of course, they all laughed knowing I was tongue-in-cheek.  Even the regular players at casino don&#039;t trust it. And they&#039;re Asian, all them hard core sharks I talked to just do not trust it. Nobody does.But to be honest, I still play online, I just play different. I wait until it&#039;s &quot;rigged in my favor&quot;. I figured it out. But I know the type of ways it works.  Like the poster said above, you play into the rig. You realize it&#039;s rigged. Then, duh.. use that to your advantage.I mean think about it.  It&#039;s rigged, so figured out how it&#039;s rigged, then play by that?!?! Easy peesy.This is the &#039;secret&#039; and why no pros or winning players will admit to it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is rigged. I don&#8217;t even question it no more. I play live too and know these things happen live.. shoot tonight it happened big time.. I joked to the table &#8220;that hand looked so much like an online hand!&#8221; And of course, they all laughed knowing I was tongue-in-cheek.  Even the regular players at casino don&#8217;t trust it. And they&#8217;re Asian, all them hard core sharks I talked to just do not trust it. Nobody does.</p><p>But to be honest, I still play online, I just play different. I wait until it&#8217;s &#8220;rigged in my favor&#8221;. I figured it out. But I know the type of ways it works.  Like the poster said above, you play into the rig. You realize it&#8217;s rigged. Then, duh.. use that to your advantage.</p><p>I mean think about it.  It&#8217;s rigged, so figured out how it&#8217;s rigged, then play by that?!?! Easy peesy.</p><p>This is the &#8216;secret&#8217; and why no pros or winning players will admit to it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Is Online Poker Rigged? 7 Poker Myths Busted by Jokerstar</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/online-poker/rigged-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link> <dc:creator>Jokerstar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=180#comment-246</guid> <description>It&#039;s about loosing when you are 90% favorit 18/20 times. Dosnt make sense, thats not variance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about loosing when you are 90% favorit 18/20 times. Dosnt make sense, thats not variance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Profitable Hole Cards – Winning Starting Hands by Marco</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/poker-mathematics/profitable-hole-cards-%e2%80%93-winning-starting-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link> <dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:19:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=331#comment-241</guid> <description>Hi Raph,This is correct. But I&#039;ve calculated the weighted percentages. For example, suited hands are stronger than offsuited hole cards. And suited cards are three times less often dealt than offsuited cards (eg on average you get three times AK offsuited for each time you get AKs). The same goes for pocket pairs, these are half as common as offsuited cards.
So that&#039;s why the percentage is only 18.4% and not 23.7%. This means that the players made all of their profits with 40 of the 169 hands. Because these top hands are dealt less often, only 18.4% of all dealt hands to the average player will earn him a profit in the long run.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raph,</p><p>This is correct. But I&#8217;ve calculated the weighted percentages. For example, suited hands are stronger than offsuited hole cards. And suited cards are three times less often dealt than offsuited cards (eg on average you get three times AK offsuited for each time you get AKs). The same goes for pocket pairs, these are half as common as offsuited cards.<br
/> So that&#8217;s why the percentage is only 18.4% and not 23.7%. This means that the players made all of their profits with 40 of the 169 hands. Because these top hands are dealt less often, only 18.4% of all dealt hands to the average player will earn him a profit in the long run.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Profitable Hole Cards – Winning Starting Hands by Raph</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/poker-mathematics/profitable-hole-cards-%e2%80%93-winning-starting-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link> <dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:12:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=331#comment-239</guid> <description>Umm... isn&#039;t 40 hands out of 169 equal to 23.7% (as opposed to the 18.4% stated in the article)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; isn&#8217;t 40 hands out of 169 equal to 23.7% (as opposed to the 18.4% stated in the article)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Profitable Hole Cards – Winning Starting Hands by Marco</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/poker-mathematics/profitable-hole-cards-%e2%80%93-winning-starting-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link> <dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:42:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=331#comment-235</guid> <description>Thank you very much cj
you were correct, the first KJ is the suited one. This error occurred while I translated my German article on the same subject of the best winning hands.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much cjyou were correct, the first KJ is the suited one. This error occurred while I translated my German article on the same subject of the best winning hands.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Alternatives to PokerStars / Full Tilt Poker by Marco</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/poker-rooms/alternatives-pokerstars-full-tilt-fbi/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link> <dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:41:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=394#comment-234</guid> <description>Yes, Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars temporarily switched to domains as their .com domains were not accessible anymore. In the meantime, the have received their .com domains back in order to enable their US players to cashout their money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars temporarily switched to domains as their .com domains were not accessible anymore. In the meantime, the have received their .com domains back in order to enable their US players to cashout their money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Profitable Hole Cards – Winning Starting Hands by cj</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/tournament-strategy/poker-mathematics/profitable-hole-cards-%e2%80%93-winning-starting-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link> <dc:creator>cj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=331#comment-233</guid> <description>KJ is in two cats. the one in 6-14 should probably say KJs</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KJ is in two cats. the one in 6-14 should probably say KJs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Alternatives to PokerStars / Full Tilt Poker by Aussie</title><link>http://www.tournamentterminator.com/poker-rooms/alternatives-pokerstars-full-tilt-fbi/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link> <dc:creator>Aussie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:52:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tournamentterminator.com/?p=394#comment-232</guid> <description>It seems they switched the main sites to fulltilpoker.co.uk and pokerstars.eu, the software also has been updated to block deposits from US players temporarily.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems they switched the main sites to fulltilpoker.co.uk and pokerstars.eu, the software also has been updated to block deposits from US players temporarily.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/24 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.tournamentterminator.com @ 2012-02-06 04:14:28 -->
